Rango 2: Why Gore Verbinski Says a Sequel Is a Big Ask

Rango 2: Why Gore Verbinski Says a Sequel Is a Big Ask
source: gettyimages
March 4, 2026

Rango, the 2011 animated Western from Paramount Pictures, proved to be a movie-market phenomenon, grossing about $246 million worldwide on a production budget near $135 million. It also earned strong reviews, sitting in the high 80s on Rotten Tomatoes. Yet a follow-up has never materialized, and as the film marks its 15th birthday, director Gore Verbinski explains why a Rango 2 hasn’t happened.

Verbinski notes that the film was forged during a uniquely fortunate window — a combination of ambition, timing, and cost that aligned with the project’s goals. He points out that the budget put the movie in the same league as the top-tier animated features, which makes a sequel financially fraught to pull off. “That was such a strange, fortuitous set of circumstances,” he says, acknowledging that reproducing that exact magic would be difficult.

That complexity is why a Rango 2 remains a hard proposition. However, Verbinski isn’t completely opposed to the idea; he suggests that interest would need to come from “someone with a check book” who is willing to fund the project. Until such an offer lands, the director’s plates remain focused elsewhere.

In the meantime, Verbinski is sharing his thoughts on his current project, Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die — a time-travel adventure that marks his return to feature filmmaking after a decade-long hiatus, following his work on A Cure for Wellness. For fans hoping for a Rango revival, the door isn’t technically closed, but any sequel would require a very specific, well-timed investment.

If you’re curious, you can also hear Verbinski reflect on the film’s most shocking moments and the broader implications of AI addressed in his recent work.

Related links

By submitting, I confirm I have the right to share this link and I agree to link back to this article from the submitted page. Duplicate URLs are rejected. Up to 5 links per page.

GraphQL · 146 ms
query Q($id: Int!, $domain: Int!, $srcId: Int!, $hasSrc: Boolean!, $hasSelf: Boolean!) {
  self: qa_ai(where: {id: {_eq: $id}}, limit: 1) @include(if: $hasSelf) {
    id
    title
    text
    date
  }
  linksarticle: qa_ai(where: {domain: {_eq: $domain}, id: {_neq: $id}}, order_by: {id: desc}, limit: 8) {
    id
    title
  }
  linksbottom: qa_ai(where: {domain: {_neq: $domain}, id: {_lt: $id}}, order_by: {id: desc}, limit: 3) {
    id
    title
    domain
  }
  source: qa_ai(where: {id: {_eq: $srcId}}, limit: 1) @include(if: $hasSrc) {
    id
    title
  }
}
{
  "id": 6646298,
  "domain": 6,
  "srcId": 0,
  "hasSrc": false,
  "hasSelf": true
}